OASIS Mailing List ArchivesView the OASIS mailing list archive below
or browse/search using MarkMail.


Help: OASIS Mailing Lists Help | MarkMail Help



   RE: [xml-dev] After XQuery, are we done?

[ Lists Home | Date Index | Thread Index ]

At 11:56 AM 10/22/2004, DuCharme, Bob (LNG-CHO) wrote:
>Perhaps "representing relationships" would be the lower-hanging fruit, but
>we don't need a new standard to say that resource X has relationship Y to
>resource Z; we've got RDF for that.

         I couldn't disagree more.

         The example of the Web demonstrates that usage will come from 
simplicity. If I have a specification that says, "Add an attribute of 
href='foo' to anything and it becomes a link," people will use it.

         You're proposing we say, "Look, you want links? Well, first write 
yourself a DTD. Then a stylesheet. Oh, and by the way, you'll need to write 
an RDF vocabularly to represent the data relationships, too. Hope you like 

         Somehow, I just don't think people will be jumping on that bandwagon.

         A linking specification needs to be simpler. But think about it: 
if the styling people actually add linking mechanisms into their 
specifications, it'd work with RDF -and- a simpler linking 
specification...and everything else, too.

         That's a win/win scenario, as far as I can tell.



News | XML in Industry | Calendar | XML Registry
Marketplace | Resources | MyXML.org | Sponsors | Privacy Statement

Copyright 2001 XML.org. This site is hosted by OASIS