xml-dev - Re: [xml-dev] After XQuery, are we done?

Re: [xml-dev] After XQuery, are we done?

[ Lists Home | Date Index | Thread Index ]

To: 'XML Developers List' <xml-dev@lists.xml.org>
Subject: Re: [xml-dev] After XQuery, are we done?
From: Gavin Thomas Nicol <gtn@rbii.com>
Date: Sat, 23 Oct 2004 21:42:58 -0400
In-reply-to: <20041022152333.HAS1100.mta09-svc.ntlworld.com@Turtle>
References: <20041022152333.HAS1100.mta09-svc.ntlworld.com@Turtle>

On Oct 22, 2004, at 11:22 AM, Michael Kay wrote:

> Hyperlinks belong in the user interface space, XML should represent
> information independently of the user interface. It was always
> architecturally wrong to do hyperlinking at the XML level and the 
> attempt
> should not be repeated.
>
> "Modelling relationships in XML" - that would be different.

What is a hyperlink if not a relationship? The interpretation and 
presentation are obviously application-specific, but...

References:
- RE: [xml-dev] After XQuery, are we done?
  - From: "Michael Kay" <michael.h.kay@ntlworld.com>

Prev by Date: Re: [xml-dev] xml-entity PI
Next by Date: Re: [xml-dev] XML Data Modellling/Linking (was RE: [xml-dev] Afte r XQuery, are we done?)
Previous by thread: Re: [xml-dev] After XQuery, are we done?
Next by thread: RE: [xml-dev] After XQuery, are we done?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread