xml-dev - Re: [xml-dev] When to check entity WFness according to 4.3.2

Re: [xml-dev] When to check entity WFness according to 4.3.2

[ Lists Home | Date Index | Thread Index ]

To: xml-dev@lists.xml.org
Subject: Re: [xml-dev] When to check entity WFness according to 4.3.2
From: richard@inf.ed.ac.uk (Richard Tobin)
Date: Tue, 26 Oct 2004 16:09:05 +0100 (BST)
Cc:
In-reply-to: <005801c4bb69$b01b8410$9e539696@citkwaclaww2k>
Organization: HCRC, University of Edinburgh

>But the prolog is part of the document production, so if an entity declared
>in the prolog is not well-formed, then should that not mean the document
>is not well-formed? 

The requirement is that "Each of the parsed entities which is
referenced directly or indirectly within the document is well-formed."
An entity is certainly *declared* in the prolog, but it is not
*referenced* there.

-- Richard

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [xml-dev] When to check entity WFness according to 4.3.2
  - From: Jeff Rafter <lists@jeffrafter.com>
- Re: [xml-dev] When to check entity WFness according to 4.3.2
  - From: "Karl Waclawek" <karl@waclawek.net>

References:
- Re: [xml-dev] When to check entity WFness according to 4.3.2
  - From: "Karl Waclawek" <karl@waclawek.net>

Prev by Date: Re: [xml-dev] After XQuery, are we done?
Next by Date: RE: [xml-dev] After XQuery, are we done?
Previous by thread: Re: [xml-dev] When to check entity WFness according to 4.3.2
Next by thread: Re: [xml-dev] When to check entity WFness according to 4.3.2
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread