xml-dev - Re: [xml-dev] Partyin' like it's 1999

Re: [xml-dev] Partyin' like it's 1999

[ Lists Home | Date Index | Thread Index ]

To: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <len.bullard@intergraph.com>
Subject: Re: [xml-dev] Partyin' like it's 1999
From: Robert Koberg <rob@koberg.com>
Date: Wed, 27 Oct 2004 03:44:02 -0700
Cc: xml-dev@lists.xml.org
In-reply-to: <15725CF6AFE2F34DB8A5B4770B7334EE07206889@hq1.pcmail.ingr.com>
References: <15725CF6AFE2F34DB8A5B4770B7334EE07206889@hq1.pcmail.ingr.com>
User-agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 0.7 (Macintosh/20040616)

Bullard, Claude L (Len) wrote:

> Ok.  Any parties interested in posting their favorite five 
> bad problems with XML in order here?  I wonder what the 
> consensus is on the top two.  (XML, not XML apps like 
> XSD.)

1. memory usage for the dom(like) (hasn't affected me yet, but I 
continually worry about it as we grow)
2.
3. synchronous io
4.
5. going from utf-8 to us-ascii

I don't get the /problem/ with namespaces.

References:
- RE: [xml-dev] Partyin' like it's 1999
  - From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <len.bullard@intergraph.com>

Prev by Date: Re: [xml-dev] After XQuery, are we done?
Next by Date: RE: [xml-dev] Schema Evolution
Previous by thread: Re: [xml-dev] Partyin' like it's 1999
Next by thread: Re: [xml-dev] Partyin' like it's 1999
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread