OASIS Mailing List ArchivesView the OASIS mailing list archive below
or browse/search using MarkMail.


Help: OASIS Mailing Lists Help | MarkMail Help



   Re: [xml-dev] Partyin' like it's 1999

[ Lists Home | Date Index | Thread Index ]

> XML canonicalisation. In particular, I want to avoid the complexities 
> that result from combining  XML 1.0  canonicalisation with namespaces 
> (e.g. Exclusive XML canonicalization :-)

Once you done the work of C14N, exc-c14n isn't that much more. :)

Less flippantly, I took a look at RIG2 and skimmed RIG3.  It seems like 
the combination of limitations on xmlns (not at the docroot, no 
bleed-thru, no use of alternate prefixes, etc) means that you're 
essentially outlawing the ability to use a layered SOAP implementation. 
  Was that the intent?

Also requirement 25 in RIG2 (no superfluous declarations) seems 
redundant since RIG2 already mandates RIG3.
Rich Salz, Chief Security Architect
DataPower Technology                           http://www.datapower.com
XS40 XML Security Gateway   http://www.datapower.com/products/xs40.html
XML Security Overview  http://www.datapower.com/xmldev/xmlsecurity.html


News | XML in Industry | Calendar | XML Registry
Marketplace | Resources | MyXML.org | Sponsors | Privacy Statement

Copyright 2001 XML.org. This site is hosted by OASIS