xml-dev - Re: [xml-dev] Partyin' like it's 1999

Re: [xml-dev] Partyin' like it's 1999

[ Lists Home | Date Index | Thread Index ]

To: Elliotte Harold <elharo@metalab.unc.edu>, xml-dev@lists.xml.org
Subject: Re: [xml-dev] Partyin' like it's 1999
From: "J.Pietschmann" <j3322ptm@yahoo.de>
Date: Wed, 27 Oct 2004 23:00:13 +0200
In-reply-to: <417F827B.8090406@metalab.unc.edu>
References: <15725CF6AFE2F34DB8A5B4770B7334EE0720688D@hq1.pcmail.ingr.com> <417F827B.8090406@metalab.unc.edu>
User-agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 0.8 (Windows/20040913)

Elliotte Harold wrote:
> If Microsoft-platform developers are confused about the significance of 
> white space, it's because Microsoft deliberately deviated from the 
> specifications when writing their implementations, not because there's 
> anything fundamentally confusing about white space.

Having taught web designer classes, I can assure you there
must be something fundamentally confusing about white space.

J.Pietschmann

References:
- RE: [xml-dev] Partyin' like it's 1999
  - From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <len.bullard@intergraph.com>
- Re: [xml-dev] Partyin' like it's 1999
  - From: Elliotte Harold <elharo@metalab.unc.edu>

Prev by Date: RE: [xml-dev] After XQuery, are we done?
Next by Date: RE: [xml-dev] After XQuery, are we done?
Previous by thread: Re: [xml-dev] Partyin' like it's 1999
Next by thread: RE: [xml-dev] Partyin' like it's 1999
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread