Lists Home |
Date Index |
Elliotte Harold wrote:
> Bullard, Claude L (Len) wrote:
> This article is absolute crap
Seconded on every single aspect.
> The one thing that's mildly interesting in his article is the claim that
> the Unicode 2.0 character repertoire has caused real problems for some
> Asian Microsoft customers. I've heard this claim before, but I've never
> been able to verify it. If he's got real data, I'd like to see it. Which
> missing characters were needed? And were they really needed in markup
> and not text? (This is a very common source of confusion.)
And aren't we all in awe of the absolutely massive amount of support
Microsoft is putting behind supporting the deployment of XML 1.1?