xml-dev - RE: [xml-dev] Partyin' like it's 1999

RE: [xml-dev] Partyin' like it's 1999

[ Lists Home | Date Index | Thread Index ]

To: xml-dev@lists.xml.org
Subject: RE: [xml-dev] Partyin' like it's 1999
From: "Sergio J. Rodriguez M." <srodriguez142857@yahoo.com>
Date: Wed, 27 Oct 2004 21:34:30 -0500 (CDT)
In-reply-to: <830178CE7378FC40BC6F1DDADCFDD1D1027670BE@RED-MSG-31.redmond.corp.microsoft.com>
Reply-to: srodriguez142857@yahoo.com

If Namespaces are in fact a disaster, then why is widely used in any XML Vocabulary, like RDF or OWL?

If these are a disaster, then the basis of the Semantic Web -OWL, RDF-, and many other systems are in big trouble...

All the best,

-Sergio Rodríguez

Dare Obasanjo <dareo@microsoft.com> wrote:

3.) Namespaces are close to a disaster [but not quite, that dubious honor goes to W3C XML Schema]

Do You Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Net: La mejor conexión a internet y 25MB extra a tu correo por $100 al mes.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [xml-dev] Partyin' like it's 1999
  - From: Elliotte Harold <elharo@metalab.unc.edu>

References:
- RE: [xml-dev] Partyin' like it's 1999
  - From: "Dare Obasanjo" <dareo@microsoft.com>