[
Lists Home |
Date Index |
Thread Index
]
Tim Bray wrote:
> Just a reminder that the RDF.net challenge is still open: see
> http://www.tbray.org/ongoing/When/200x/2003/05/21/RDFNet (you can skip
> all the history and markup-pedantry and jump to the challenge itself, at
> the bottom of that essay). -Tim
I read the history and markup-pedantry and skipped the challenge :)
I agree that the "RDF-the-idea a whole lot better than RDF the actual
technology." And your sample syntax is a whole lot better than RDF's
syntax. But I have trouble believing that RDF will go anywhere as long
as it depends on URIs like:
http://www.example.com/terms/editor
Let's face it. I want to write about Bob, Bob's house, the address of
Bob's house, and the color of Bob's house, not:
http://www.example.com/terms/person
http://www.example.com/terms/name
http://www.example.com/terms/house
http://www.example.com/terms/owner
http://www.example.com/terms/address
http://www.example.com/terms/color
...
-- Ron
|
