[
Lists Home |
Date Index |
Thread Index
]
Ronald Bourret wrote:
> I agree that the "RDF-the-idea a whole lot better than RDF the actual
> technology." And your sample syntax is a whole lot better than RDF's
> syntax. But I have trouble believing that RDF will go anywhere as long
> as it depends on URIs like:
>
> http://www.example.com/terms/editor
>
> Let's face it. I want to write about Bob, Bob's house, the address of
> Bob's house, and the color of Bob's house, not:
>
> http://www.example.com/terms/person
> http://www.example.com/terms/name
> http://www.example.com/terms/house
> http://www.example.com/terms/owner
> http://www.example.com/terms/address
> http://www.example.com/terms/color
Data:
@prefix dc: <http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/> .
@prefix : <http://example.org/book/> .
@prefix ns: <http://example.org/ns#> .
:book1 dc:title "SPARQL Tutorial" .
:book1 ns:price 42 .
:book2 dc:title "The Semantic Web" .
:book2 ns:price 23 .
Query :
PREFIX dc: <http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/>
PREFIX ns: <http://example.org/ns#>
SELECT ?title ?price
WHERE ( ?x dc:title ?title )
( ?x ns:price ?price ) AND ?price < 30
Query Result:
title price
"The Semantic Web" 23
http://www.w3.org/TR/2004/WD-rdf-sparql-query-20041012/
cheers
Bill
|
