xml-dev - Re: [xml-dev] XML Pipeline vs an XML Grid

Re: [xml-dev] XML Pipeline vs an XML Grid

[ Lists Home | Date Index | Thread Index ]

To: xml-dev@lists.xml.org
Subject: Re: [xml-dev] XML Pipeline vs an XML Grid
From: Ronald Bourret <rpbourret@rpbourret.com>
Date: Sun, 05 Dec 2004 09:35:04 -0800
In-reply-to: <41B2E9BD.8030507@zenucom.com>
References: <009801c4d941$ad985600$6501a8c0@dell8100> <20041203201954.25440.qmail@web20822.mail.yahoo.com> <e3a5cb2c0412031223645b7858@mail.gmail.com> <41B14D45.8000902@rpbourret.com> <1102141005.41b1564d2e661@65.39.203.11> <41B29521.9050505@rpbourret.com> <1102240581.41b2db4577a3b@65.39.203.11> <41B2E9BD.8030507@zenucom.com>
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.4) Gecko/20030624 Netscape/7.1 (ax)

Rick Marshall wrote:

> i think the original request is for something closer to a workflow where 
> each process completes its modifications before handing the message as a 
> whole to the next process(es) in the queue.

Agreed. Which is why I mentioned products that definitely don't fit the 
narrower, more technically correct, definition of pipe/pipeline.

-- Ron

References:
- XML Pipeline
  - From: "Stephen E. Beller" <sbeller@nhds.com>
- Re: [xml-dev] XML Pipeline
  - From: Christopher Milton <cmiltonperl@yahoo.com>
- Re: [xml-dev] XML Pipeline
  - From: Michael Champion <michaelc.champion@gmail.com>
- Re: [xml-dev] XML Pipeline
  - From: Ronald Bourret <rpbourret@rpbourret.com>
- Re: [xml-dev] XML Pipeline
  - From: david.lyon@computergrid.net
- Re: [xml-dev] XML Pipeline
  - From: Ronald Bourret <rpbourret@rpbourret.com>
- Re: [xml-dev] XML Pipeline vs an XML Grid
  - From: david.lyon@computergrid.net
- Re: [xml-dev] XML Pipeline vs an XML Grid
  - From: Rick Marshall <rjm@zenucom.com>

Prev by Date: Re: [xml-dev] XML Pipeline vs an XML Grid
Next by Date: Re: XML Pipeline
Previous by thread: Re: [xml-dev] XML Pipeline vs an XML Grid
Next by thread: Re: [xml-dev] XML Pipeline vs an XML Grid
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread