[
Lists Home |
Date Index |
Thread Index
]
Elliotte Harold scripsit:
> 2. related point: Namespaces 1.1 is defined in terms of IRIs, not URIs.
> How is this handled?
I'd say, use the defined mapping to make an IRI into a URI, and go
with the URI.
> 3. Should this be any valid URI reference instead of any valid URI?
By the new post-2396 rules, "URI" means "absolute URI with or without
fragment identifier". In 2396, "URI" had no formal definition.
> 4. What if the namespace URI uses percent escapes? Do the percent signs
> now need to be double escaped? (I expect they do, but this should be
> made explicit.)
Why would this be necessary?
More significantly, RFC 2141 forbids certain URI characters from
appearing in URNs.
--
John Cowan <cowan@ccil.org> http://www.ccil.org/~cowan
"One time I called in to the central system and started working on a big
thick 'sed' and 'awk' heavy duty data bashing script. One of the geologists
came by, looked over my shoulder and said 'Oh, that happens to me too.
Try hanging up and phoning in again.'" --Beverly Erlebacher
|
