[
Lists Home |
Date Index |
Thread Index
]
Hi David,
Le mercredi 05 janvier 2005 à 09:24 -0500, David Megginson a écrit :
> On Wed, 5 Jan 2005 06:21:37 -0800, Dare Obasanjo <dareo@microsoft.com> wrote:
>
> > Looks like you'd have just reinvented xsi:type.
>
> Right, but for instances rather than schemas. Or are the specs
> blessing its use in document instances now?
What do you mean?
xsi:type has always be for use in instance documents rather than schemas
(that's why this attribute belongs to a specific namespace)...
My 0.2 ¤
Eric (who doesn't believe that it's such a good idea anyway)
--
Lisez-moi sur XMLfr.
http://xmlfr.org/index/person/eric+van+der+vlist/
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Eric van der Vlist http://xmlfr.org http://dyomedea.com
(ISO) RELAX NG ISBN:0-596-00421-4 http://oreilly.com/catalog/relax
(W3C) XML Schema ISBN:0-596-00252-1 http://oreilly.com/catalog/xmlschema
------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
