Re: [xml-dev] xml 2.0 - so it's on the way after all?

[Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com>]

/ David Lyon <david.lyon@computergrid.net> was heard to say:
| On Thursday 03 February 2005 06:26 pm, you wrote:
|> > I can see your point. I guess they chose the less and greater than
|> > characters because they look a bit smoother on the screen
|>
|> Screen? We're talking about the 1960s.
|
| Are you saying xml is that old? I'd be interested any reading any
| links about xml in the sixties...

Since no one else has mentioned it, XML is a direct descendent of SGML
which does have a heritage that goes back to the 60's.

                                        Be seeing you,
                                          norm

-- 
Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com> | A man's dying is more the survivors'
http://nwalsh.com/            | affair than his own.--Thomas Mann

PGP signature