xml-dev - Re: [xml-dev] xml 2.0 - so it's on the way after all?

Re: [xml-dev] xml 2.0 - so it's on the way after all?

[ Lists Home | Date Index | Thread Index ]

To: xml-dev@lists.xml.org
Subject: Re: [xml-dev] xml 2.0 - so it's on the way after all?
From: Karl Waclawek <karl@waclawek.net>
Date: Fri, 04 Feb 2005 11:35:59 -0500
In-reply-to: <6.0.0.22.0.20050204175833.022d1828@pop.saunalahti.fi>
References: <Pine.LNX.4.44L0.0501280904130.20504-100000@smtp.datapower.com> <200502032213.56841.david.lyon@computergrid.net> <4202A983.6030803@zenucom.com> <4202C65B.7000207@objfac.com> <6.0.0.22.0.20050204175833.022d1828@pop.saunalahti.fi>
User-agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0 (Windows/20041206)

Toni Uusitalo wrote:

> 
> The following document is well-formed (and valid too but that's not the 
> point) but very troublesome to parse for MSXML (IE6 crashes) and Expat. 
> Works ok with RXP and Parsifal - haven't test others.

Worked fine with current Expat.

Karl

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [xml-dev] xml 2.0 - so it's on the way after all?
  - From: Toni Uusitalo <toni.uusitalo@pan.nu>

References:
- xml 2.0 - so it's on the way after all?
  - From: David Lyon <david.lyon@computergrid.net>
- Re: [xml-dev] xml 2.0 - so it's on the way after all?
  - From: Rick Marshall <rjm@zenucom.com>
- Re: [xml-dev] xml 2.0 - so it's on the way after all?
  - From: Bob Foster <bob@objfac.com>
- Re: [xml-dev] xml 2.0 - so it's on the way after all?
  - From: Toni Uusitalo <toni.uusitalo@pan.nu>

Prev by Date: IT Manager Survey Finds 59% Of UK Businesses Are Now Using XML
Next by Date: Re: [xml-dev] xml 2.0 - so it's on the way after all?
Previous by thread: Re: [xml-dev] xml 2.0 - so it's on the way after all?
Next by thread: Re: [xml-dev] xml 2.0 - so it's on the way after all?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread