xml-dev - Re: [xml-dev] xml 2.0 - so it's on the way after all?

Re: [xml-dev] xml 2.0 - so it's on the way after all?

[ Lists Home | Date Index | Thread Index ]

To: Amelia A Lewis <amyzing@talsever.com>
Subject: Re: [xml-dev] xml 2.0 - so it's on the way after all?
From: Jeff Rafter <lists@jeffrafter.com>
Date: Fri, 04 Feb 2005 12:57:01 -0800
Cc: Toni Uusitalo <toni.uusitalo@pan.nu>, xml-dev@lists.xml.org
In-reply-to: <20050204204803.GA31024@talsever.com>
References: <6.0.0.22.0.20050204222038.02251d70@pop.saunalahti.fi> <20050204204803.GA31024@talsever.com>
Reply-to: lists@jeffrafter.com
User-agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0 (Windows/20041206)

> At present, there's no apparent activity targeted toward providing an
> alternate entity-definition mechanism.

Maybe XInclude? I guess it would depend on the use case...

Cheers,
Jeff Rafter

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [xml-dev] xml 2.0 - so it's on the way after all?
  - From: Amelia A Lewis <amyzing@talsever.com>

References:
- Re: [xml-dev] xml 2.0 - so it's on the way after all?
  - From: Toni Uusitalo <toni.uusitalo@pan.nu>
- Re: [xml-dev] xml 2.0 - so it's on the way after all?
  - From: Amelia A Lewis <amyzing@talsever.com>

Prev by Date: Re: [xml-dev] xml 2.0 - so it's on the way after all?
Next by Date: Re: [xml-dev] xml 2.0 - so it's on the way after all?
Previous by thread: Re: [xml-dev] xml 2.0 - so it's on the way after all?
Next by thread: Re: [xml-dev] xml 2.0 - so it's on the way after all?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread