[
Lists Home |
Date Index |
Thread Index
]
> The only compelling reason for a binary standard would be if the
> cost/benefit ratio is appropriate to begin with. Which boils down to
> "how much faster? And perhaps, how much smaller?" vs. "how much
> additional complexity and pain does it cause". Until those questions
> are answered with prototypes and hard data, argueing remains handwaving
> speculative FUD, and no reasonable opinion can be formed either way.
Perhaps you should look at what the XML Binary Characterization WG is
doing, then. (Between karaoke practice, that is. :)
/r$
--
Rich Salz Chief Security Architect
DataPower Technology http://www.datapower.com
XS40 XML Security Gateway http://www.datapower.com/products/xs40.html
XML Security Overview http://www.datapower.com/xmldev/xmlsecurity.html
|