[
Lists Home |
Date Index |
Thread Index
]
Le jeudi 24 février 2005 à 09:34 -0500, Liam Quin a écrit :
> On Thu, Feb 24, 2005 at 04:44:03PM +1100, Rick Jelliffe wrote:
> > David Carlisle wrote:
> >
> >> No, he meant XSLT1, specifically that you can use the document()
> >> function which is defined as an XPath function by XSLT not in the
> >> Xpath rec.
>
> > That is correct. The normative references[3] are to XPath 1 and XSLT 1.
>
> Thanks, Rick. I was afraid they were generic references. Probably
> better for ISO to update their spec in a year or so to reflect
> the latest XPath than to have implementations using differing versions.
I wouldn't like to restart a permathread, but in the case of XPath, it
makes a lot sense IMO to make a reference to either XPath 1.0 or XPath
2.0 since they can be considered as two different languages...
My 0.02 ¤.
Eric
--
Curious about Relax NG? Read my book online.
http://books.xmlschemata.org/relaxng/
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Eric van der Vlist http://xmlfr.org http://dyomedea.com
(ISO) RELAX NG ISBN:0-596-00421-4 http://oreilly.com/catalog/relax
(W3C) XML Schema ISBN:0-596-00252-1 http://oreilly.com/catalog/xmlschema
------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
