xml-dev - RE: [xml-dev] [About Unicode] Why the symbol LOGICAL NOT is missing from

RE: [xml-dev] [About Unicode] Why the symbol LOGICAL NOT is missing from

[ Lists Home | Date Index | Thread Index ]

To: <xml-dev@lists.xml.org>
Subject: RE: [xml-dev] [About Unicode] Why the symbol LOGICAL NOT is missing from the UCS ?
From: "Paul Spencer" <xml-dev@boynings.co.uk>
Date: Fri, 4 Mar 2005 12:14:02 -0000
Importance: Normal
In-reply-to: <200503042235.05201.david.lyon@computergrid.net>

> -----Original Message-----
> From: David Lyon [mailto:david.lyon@computergrid.net]
> Sent: 05 March 2005 03:35
> To: Bob Foster
> Cc: xml-dev@lists.xml.org
> Subject: Re: [xml-dev] [About Unicode] Why the symbol LOGICAL NOT is
> missing from the UCS ?
> 
> 
> In any case, functionality in data representation is way more important
> than cosmetics.

Tell that to Joan Collins.

References:
- Re: [xml-dev] [About Unicode] Why the symbol LOGICAL NOT is missing from the UCS ?
  - From: David Lyon <david.lyon@computergrid.net>

Prev by Date: RE: [xml-dev] Do I need XML parser ?
Next by Date: Re: [xml-dev] [About Unicode] Why the symbol LOGICAL NOT is missing from the UCS ?
Previous by thread: Re: [xml-dev] [About Unicode] Why the symbol LOGICAL NOT is missing from the UCS ?
Next by thread: Re: [xml-dev] [About Unicode] Why the symbol LOGICAL NOT is missing from the UCS ?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread