xml-dev - RE: [xml-dev] [About Unicode] Why the symbol LOGICAL NOT is missing from

RE: [xml-dev] [About Unicode] Why the symbol LOGICAL NOT is missing from

[ Lists Home | Date Index | Thread Index ]

To: "'Rick Marshall'" <rjm@zenucom.com>,<xml-dev@lists.xml.org>
Subject: RE: [xml-dev] [About Unicode] Why the symbol LOGICAL NOT is missing from the UCS ?
From: "Michael Kay" <mike@saxonica.com>
Date: Fri, 4 Mar 2005 21:42:13 -0000
In-reply-to: <4228D1A0.7060007@zenucom.com>
Thread-index: AcUhAKKAMgvMSL7yQiuiAEzCLoCxIgAAU2hQ

> it always existed in ebcdic 

... but had a sorry history of being overlaid onto the same codepoint as
tilde and/or overline and/or macron.

Michael Kay
http://www.saxonica.com/

References:
- Re: [xml-dev] [About Unicode] Why the symbol LOGICAL NOT is missingfrom the UCS ?
  - From: Rick Marshall <rjm@zenucom.com>

Prev by Date: Re: [xml-dev] Schema, BNF and parsing
Next by Date: RE: [xml-dev] [About Unicode] Why the symbol LOGICAL NOT is missing from the UCS ?
Previous by thread: Re: [xml-dev] [About Unicode] Why the symbol LOGICAL NOT is missingfrom the UCS ?
Next by thread: RE: [xml-dev] [About Unicode] Why the symbol LOGICAL NOT is missing from the UCS ?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

News | XML in Industry | Calendar | XML Registry
Marketplace | Resources | MyXML.org | Sponsors | Privacy Statement

Copyright 2001 XML.org. This site is hosted by OASIS