xml-dev - Re: [xml-dev] Rigged Aggregators?

Re: [xml-dev] Rigged Aggregators?

[ Lists Home | Date Index | Thread Index ]

To: Bill Kearney <wkearney@syndic8.com>
Subject: Re: [xml-dev] Rigged Aggregators?
From: Peter Hunsberger <peter.hunsberger@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 10 Mar 2005 13:27:52 -0600
Cc: "Prine, Gil" <Gil.Prine@unisys.com>, "xml-dev@lists. xml. org" <xml-dev@lists.xml.org>
Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:references; b=BmHX45+SpVwBPvbyLtBuEs2bA2gGEUIUl/yRkW2zf3ZtkunGkLyMAiDAi+mFa2Ev7WulpXh4K37zca3LZijvZh6u53lgyBA2QN4MfTaNUcu9yUcXbQQ6m5a5beoL7DoteMmJtKBYbnd8cljs78TIv1AnYN5QjW/wpEw7jAppC80=
In-reply-to: <42309B4F.7020803@syndic8.com>
References: <98C12BCABB820D42986C68F03EBC0A810576616D@usres-exch1.na.uis.unisys.com> <42309B4F.7020803@syndic8.com>
Reply-to: Peter Hunsberger <peter.hunsberger@gmail.com>

On Thu, 10 Mar 2005 14:09:03 -0500, Bill Kearney <wkearney@syndic8.com> wrote:
> 
> Seems like a bunch of hogwash to me.  More like some crackpot trying to
> get traction for ludicrous ideas by associating unrelated terminologies
> with them.  Sounds more like someone needs an upgrade to 'TinFoilHat v.2'

I think you're being overly generous: PaddedRoomML might be more like it...

-- 
Peter Hunsberger

References:
- RE: [xml-dev] Rigged Aggregators?
  - From: "Prine, Gil" <Gil.Prine@unisys.com>
- Re: [xml-dev] Rigged Aggregators?
  - From: Bill Kearney <wkearney@syndic8.com>

Prev by Date: RE: [xml-dev] Rigged Aggregators?
Next by Date: Best practices for default values for attributes?
Previous by thread: Re: [xml-dev] Rigged Aggregators?
Next by thread: RE: [xml-dev] Rigged Aggregators?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread