Lists Home |
Date Index |
Yeah. This is with the assumption that the mentioned libxmlj
implementation of libxml and libxslt uses the JAXP interface to
implement a transformation as this is the impression I received from
your first post. Is this not the case?
On Mon, 28 Mar 2005 19:44:05 +0100, Chris Burdess <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
> M. David Peterson wrote:
> > Sweet! Thanks for the info :) I'm glad to see the agressive stance
> > to integrate this directly... I'm assuming by doing so you/they? are
> > able to shave some time off the clock?
> Not really. I assume you're talking about the implementation of
> Chris Burdess
:: M. David Peterson ::
XML & XML Transformations, C#, .NET, and Functional Languages Specialist