xml-dev - RE: [xml-dev] Re: Non-infoset

RE: [xml-dev] Re: Non-infoset

[ Lists Home | Date Index | Thread Index ]

To: "'Richard Tobin'" <richard@inf.ed.ac.uk>,<xml-dev@lists.xml.org>
Subject: RE: [xml-dev] Re: Non-infoset
From: "Michael Kay" <mike@saxonica.com>
Date: Mon, 11 Apr 2005 16:01:27 +0100
In-reply-to: <20050411142630.72EEF28B8F3@macintosh.inf.ed.ac.uk>
Thread-index: AcU+ouGSsVhMXKS4QzKHX//iDOkjNgABD3kw

> they were deprecated following a W3C XML plenary
> ballot, which resolved that future specifications would define no
> interpretation for them. 

Which must be the best example of the rule that the more people you involve
in a technical decision, the worse the decision.

Michael Kay
http://www.saxonica.com/

References:
- Re: [xml-dev] Re: Non-infoset
  - From: richard@inf.ed.ac.uk (Richard Tobin)

Prev by Date: Re: [xml-dev] Re: Non-infoset
Next by Date: Are URIs Resources? (WAS RE: [xml-dev] Re: Non-infoset)
Previous by thread: Re: [xml-dev] Re: Non-infoset
Next by thread: Re: [xml-dev] Re: Non-infoset
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread