[
Lists Home |
Date Index |
Thread Index
]
Bullard, Claude L (Len) wrote:
>So a URI is a function?
>
>
i'm confused (as usual) - does the uri on a namespace definition make
sense by being allowed to be a null function?
>No, a resource is a function per definition.
>A resource maps a URI to another URI in the case of a redirect.
>
>A URI is an argument to a resource?
>
>It makes better sense that way. A hyperlink is not a URI. A hyperlink is
>a function. A hyperlink can be a resource (and so can anything else except
>a URI).
>
>
>len
>
>
>From: Jan Algermissen [mailto:jalgermissen@topicmapping.com]
>
>Bullard, Claude L (Len) wrote:
>
>
>
>>Wait a minute. Rereading that: then a URI IS a resource
>>because resource identifiers are in the set.
>>
>>
>>
>Hmm...no, (I think) it is either/or. A redirect is a case where the
>function maps to a URI.
>
>-----------------------------------------------------------------
>The xml-dev list is sponsored by XML.org <http://www.xml.org>, an
>initiative of OASIS <http://www.oasis-open.org>
>
>The list archives are at http://lists.xml.org/archives/xml-dev/
>
>To subscribe or unsubscribe from this list use the subscription
>manager: <http://www.oasis-open.org/mlmanage/index.php>
>
>
>!DSPAM:425aed29217091004620198!
>
>
>
begin:vcard
fn:Rick Marshall
n:Marshall;Rick
email;internet:rjm@zenucom.com
tel;cell:+61 411 287 530
x-mozilla-html:TRUE
version:2.1
end:vcard
|
