Lists Home |
Date Index |
David Lyon wrote:
> On Fri, 15 Apr 2005 12:15 pm, Bullard, Claude L (Len) wrote:
>>I don't understand this nearly well enough. In a
>>relational database, what are the characteristics
>>of an "XML type"?
> Don't you mean "XML Document Type"? If so that is the
> equivilent to the <?DOCTYPE Invoice> tag.
> Except that when you store the document in the database
> you rip out the doctype, and store it in one of the header
> So that you can query saying something like:
> Makes it more convenient and organised that way.
Or using a filesystem (XSL 1.0):
Is the problem that filesystems are not good enough yet? (I don't have a
problem with win or linux, but I am not huge)
Do people really feel a file based system is more difficult to manage
(what with versioning - CVS/SVN, and checkout.., stage versions for
dev/qa/cert/live.., wherever/whatever) than a relational database hacked
to accomodate (roundtrip) XML?