[
Lists Home |
Date Index |
Thread Index
]
Michael Kay wrote:
> It's not actually that hard to write a conformant schema processor, or at
> least to get to the 98% mark where the only non-conformances are in areas
> where the spec writers themselves still have debates about the exact
> meaning.
How do you know it's 98% conformant? Or more generally, how can one know
a given processor is xx% conformant? That would certainly move this
discussion out of the hand-waving stage.
Bob Foster
|