RE: [xml-dev] XSD spec question

["Dare Obasanjo" <dareo@microsoft.com>]

I can think of two uses of XML Schema that extend it in this way

 

1.) http://msdn.microsoft.com/library/default.asp?url=/library/en-us/sqlxml3/htm/ssxsdannotations_0gqb.asp

 

2.) http://msdn.microsoft.com/library/default.asp?url=/library/en-us/cpguide/html/_mapping_xsd_relationships_to_dataset_relationships.asp

 

I'm sure more could be found with judicious use of Google.

--
PITHY WORDS OF WISDOM
Two wrongs are only the beginning.  

This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no rights.

 

---

From: Razvan MIHAIU [mailto:mihaiu@mihaiu.name]
Sent: Tuesday, April 26, 2005 11:01 PM
To: Ian Hunter; xml-dev@lists.xml.org
Subject: Re: [xml-dev] XSD spec question

Ian Hunter wrote:

“The obvious question is why would you need attributes outside the XML Schema specification?”

<simpleType name="myName" xml:lang="en-US">

   . . .

  </simpleType>

    This is a good example, but I am not concerned about this situation.
    Let's suppose that you will use some attributes that will actually influence the validation performed with your Schema. Is that a good practice ? Is it widespread ? Currently, I never encoutered a project in which XML Schema is extended in this way.

-- 
Regards,
Razvan

SCJP preparation material:

www.mihaiu.name/2004/sun_java_scjp_310_035/index.html
www.mihaiu.name/2004/sun_java_scjp_310_035_test1/index.html
www.mihaiu.name/2004/sun_java_scjp_310_035_test2/index.html
www.mihaiu.name/2004/sun_java_scjp_310_035_test3/index.html
www.mihaiu.name/2004/sun_java_scjp_310_035_test4/index.html