[
Lists Home |
Date Index |
Thread Index
]
Brilliant, thanks.
I'm particularly interested in -
"*Make distinctions in XML namespaces only when there are truly
distinctions between the things being named.*"
I think my current problem is deciding what makes something distinct
enough to give it it's own namespace and what level of granularity I
should adopt.
Uche Ogbuji wrote:
>On Wed, 2005-04-27 at 11:38 +1200, Fraser Crichton wrote:
>
>
>
>>What things do you think about when you decide a schema requires split
>>up into different namespaces?
>>
>>Can you point me at any articles on best practice in this area?
>>
>>
>
>http://www-106.ibm.com/developerworks/xml/library/x-namcar.html
>
>
>
>
--
Fraser Crichton
XML Developer
SolNet Solutions Limited
L12, SolNet House, 70 The Terrace
PO Box 397, Wellington, Aotearoa / New Zealand
www.solnetsolutions.co.nz <http://www.solnetsolutions.co.nz>
DDI: 04-462-5078
Mob: 027-278-3392
Fax: 04-462-5011
email: fraser.crichton@solnetsolutions.co.nz
<mailto:fraser.crichton@solnetsolutions.co.nz>
Attention:
This email may contain information intended for the sole use of
the original recipient. Please respect this when sharing or
disclosing this email's contents with any third party. If you
believe you have received this email in error, please delete it
and notify the sender or postmaster@solnetsolutions.co.nz as
soon as possible. The content of this email does not necessarily
reflect the views of SolNet Solutions Ltd.
|
