[
Lists Home |
Date Index |
Thread Index
]
Thanks. I thought that was what you meant. It
isn't about the binary or FastInfoset; it is playing
nice. That's good too.
Where we thee or me have to be careful is making
claims for the standards that lead to RFPs that
can't be implemented.
As one or the original 'wall to wall' believers,
I have to accept guilt for that too, but I also
have to face up to the facts of performance.
When we were mostly docWonks, this wasn't a
problem but now that we have MOM and MOM's
kitchen is on fire, it is and I do. Goldfarb
warned me about this years ago, and once again,
the Doctor was right.
Benchmark the performance of web services down
to the edges. Asynchronicity is not an excuse
for failing to get the mail on time. What this
means is as Derek and others suggest: we bid different
formats at the edges and we may or may not use
XML machinery for those. As we get away from
real time, we can convert, but even then, we
ought to look at the lifecycle and inquire if
this is useful.
len
From: Chiusano Joseph [mailto:chiusano_joseph@bah.com]
Here's the most recent of a series of announcements since the agreement
|
