xml-dev - RE: [xml-dev] Reject then reinvent..?

RE: [xml-dev] Reject then reinvent..?

[ Lists Home | Date Index | Thread Index ]

To: 'Michael Champion' <michaelc.champion@gmail.com>, Rick Jelliffe <ricko@allette.com.au>
Subject: RE: [xml-dev] Reject then reinvent..?
From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <len.bullard@intergraph.com>
Date: Mon, 27 Jun 2005 11:22:37 -0500
Cc: xml-dev@lists.xml.org

o One can avoid taxes and if clever, prison.

o Death is one-way.  No information is returned 
  so it is unknowable.

o Nothing is indivisible.  Without an address.

o Worse is better until something worse comes along.

So much for certainty.

len

From: Michael Champion [mailto:michaelc.champion@gmail.com]

Hmm, "nothing is certain but death, taxes, and worse-is-better
technologies."

Prev by Date: Re: [xml-dev] Reject then reinvent..?
Next by Date: [Xerces-J] DOM and Schema information
Previous by thread: Mailing list for RELAX NG users
Next by thread: [Xerces-J] DOM and Schema information
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread