xml-dev - Re: [xml-dev] Is XLink Dead? Apparently Not

Re: [xml-dev] Is XLink Dead? Apparently Not

[ Lists Home | Date Index | Thread Index ]

To: xml-dev@lists.xml.org
Subject: Re: [xml-dev] Is XLink Dead? Apparently Not
From: Alexander Johannesen <alexander.johannesen@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 29 Jun 2005 10:00:38 +1000
Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=g3VjF1ELpFq96L9lK2I0bHT7Nk6o471cFSwj27m+HiCC7Ye06rgA5KwrWx3IIGuHlvKlPzdsIJNDg3aNMv+uGbwg6LWGaLi3Pe/XmYWaDNHvevoLlzjyZDmPn9JlUG9/JOLaRvX/jfS9VVpLJmM+j+Zio+qIoaBpOC1AJvUK/zM=
In-reply-to: <1120002122.8745.23.camel@localhost.localdomain>
References: <15725CF6AFE2F34DB8A5B4770B7334EE072070BF@hq1.pcmail.ingr.com> <1120002122.8745.23.camel@localhost.localdomain>
Reply-to: Alexander Johannesen <alexander.johannesen@gmail.com>

On 6/29/05, Geoffrey Shuetrim <geoff@galexy.net> wrote:
> XLink is pretty aggressively used by XBRL (extensible business reporting
> language - http://www.xbrl.org/ ).  

For what it is worth, Topic Maps XTM also uses XLink, albeit 1.0 uses
it purely as a URL while 1.1 uses a bit more of it.


Alex
-- 
"Ultimately, all things are known because you want to believe you know."
                                                         - Frank Herbert
__ http://shelter.nu/ __________________________________________________

Follow-Ups:
- XML Digital Signature
  - From: "Roshan Mani" <roshanmani@safescrypt.com>

References:
- Is XLink Dead? Apparently Not
  - From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <len.bullard@intergraph.com>
- Re: [xml-dev] Is XLink Dead? Apparently Not
  - From: Geoffrey Shuetrim <geoff@galexy.net>

Prev by Date: Re: [xml-dev] Is XLink Dead? Apparently Not
Next by Date: XML Digital Signature
Previous by thread: Re: [xml-dev] Is XLink Dead? Apparently Not
Next by thread: XML Digital Signature
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread