[
Lists Home |
Date Index |
Thread Index
]
Bullard, Claude L (Len) wrote:
> While I applaud the speaker's call to conciseness
> as the realist property of first cause,
> I oppose the nominalist Dogma of Clarity
> as being insufficiently defenestrated.
I beg to differ. In XML Schema the dogma of clarity has been quite
sufficiently thrown out the window. ;-}
Bob
> We assuredly will apply the existentialist
> Pragma of Implementability. If there
> is no communalist consensus about that, we
> will refer this to the Subcommittee on
> Interoperability and Syntax and adjourn
> to the podicum for scree and trumpets.
>
> Strike 'will'; insert 'shall'.
>
> len
>
>
> From: Bob Foster [mailto:bob@objfac.com]
>
> Bullard, Claude L (Len) wrote:
>
>>Nah. That's too geeky, too philosophical, Kurt. Do this
>>democratically. Let's vote on technologies we want to remove
>>from or include in Web 2.0. Since we can't vote on products
>>(that's not capitalistic), let's vote on Standards.
>>
>>Anyone up for voting out XML Schema in favor of RelaxNG?
>
>
> Sure. While we're up, let's use the RelaxNG specification as an exemplar
> and vote out any W3 specification not as clearly written and concise.
>
> -----------------------------------------------------------------
> The xml-dev list is sponsored by XML.org <http://www.xml.org>, an
> initiative of OASIS <http://www.oasis-open.org>
>
> The list archives are at http://lists.xml.org/archives/xml-dev/
>
> To subscribe or unsubscribe from this list use the subscription
> manager: <http://www.oasis-open.org/mlmanage/index.php>
>
>
>
|
