xml-dev - RE: [xml-dev] Is Web 2.0 the new XML?

RE: [xml-dev] Is Web 2.0 the new XML?

[ Lists Home | Date Index | Thread Index ]

To: 'Michael Kay' <mike@saxonica.com>, 'Robin Berjon' <robin.berjon@expway.fr>
Subject: RE: [xml-dev] Is Web 2.0 the new XML?
From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <len.bullard@intergraph.com>
Date: Thu, 18 Aug 2005 09:23:32 -0500
Cc: xml-dev@lists.xml.org

Pay reputable professionals to design critical components.

It works for business.  It isn't grassroots and it doesn't 
make for media-likable myths.  It does work.

len

From: Michael Kay [mailto:mike@saxonica.com]

This is a good analysis of the problems in the schema spec, but it doesn't
answer my real question: how does one prevent standards committees from
behaving in this manner?

Follow-Ups:
- RE: [xml-dev] Is Web 2.0 the new XML?
  - From: "Michael Kay" <mike@saxonica.com>

Prev by Date: RE: [xml-dev] Is Web 2.0 the new XML?
Next by Date: RE: [xml-dev] Is Web 2.0 the new XML?
Previous by thread: RE: [xml-dev] Is Web 2.0 the new XML?
Next by thread: RE: [xml-dev] Is Web 2.0 the new XML?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread