xml-dev - Re: [xml-dev] Avoding a repeat of W3C XSD

Re: [xml-dev] Avoding a repeat of W3C XSD - was Re: [xml-dev] Is Web 2.0

[ Lists Home | Date Index | Thread Index ]

To: XML Developers List <xml-dev@lists.xml.org>
Subject: Re: [xml-dev] Avoding a repeat of W3C XSD - was Re: [xml-dev] Is Web 2.0 the new XML?
From: Michael Champion <michaelc.champion@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 19 Aug 2005 20:37:43 -0700
Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=rWVHNy9Kn7avhqOF+FLMsLeWfddaFr8A865j1gBX3JU0vz3bJwA93fG+G+gydVoATWuqnswaKgi+zcChS6uWre2+F234V0S6/7OJlas7hbHkVptvK2IFDvJ3JRu8EamDLXC2kLB+aZx94xPnY8vW3os5rJKu0rOrfMl4DIOlkkU=
In-reply-to: <20050820032049.GB14349@maribor.izzy.net>
References: <15725CF6AFE2F34DB8A5B4770B7334EE072072A0@hq1.pcmail.ingr.com> <43065DCE.6010404@metalab.unc.edu> <20050820032049.GB14349@maribor.izzy.net>

On 8/19/05, Alan Gutierrez <alan-xml-dev@engrm.com> wrote:

>    This is the second time in this thread I've seen it written that
>    Namespaces are flawed. Please point me to a disucssion or
>    article that will illustrate the flaws in Namespaces. I'd like
>    to read up so I can continue to follow along.

My personal favorite is http://xmlbastard.editthispage.com/discuss/msgReader$6
[duck]

A more temperate is 
http://www-128.ibm.com/developerworks/xml/library/x-namcar.html
Most discussions eventually link back to 
http://lists.xml.org/archives/xml-dev/200204/msg00170.html

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [xml-dev] Avoding a repeat of W3C XSD - was Re: [xml-dev] Is Web 2.0 the new XML?
  - From: Alan Gutierrez <alan-xml-dev@engrm.com>

References:
- RE: [xml-dev] Avoding a repeat of W3C XSD - was Re: [xml-dev] Is Web 2.0 the new XML?
  - From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <len.bullard@intergraph.com>
- Re: [xml-dev] Avoding a repeat of W3C XSD - was Re: [xml-dev] Is Web 2.0 the new XML?
  - From: Elliotte Harold <elharo@metalab.unc.edu>
- Re: [xml-dev] Avoding a repeat of W3C XSD - was Re: [xml-dev] Is Web 2.0 the new XML?
  - From: Alan Gutierrez <alan-xml-dev@engrm.com>

Prev by Date: Re: [xml-dev] Avoding a repeat of W3C XSD - was Re: [xml-dev] Is Web 2.0 the new XML?
Next by Date: Re: [xml-dev] Avoding a repeat of W3C XSD - was Re: [xml-dev] Is Web 2.0 the new XML?
Previous by thread: Re: [xml-dev] Avoding a repeat of W3C XSD - was Re: [xml-dev] Is Web 2.0 the new XML?
Next by thread: Re: [xml-dev] Avoding a repeat of W3C XSD - was Re: [xml-dev] Is Web 2.0 the new XML?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread