xml-dev - RE: [xml-dev] Avoding a repeat of W3C XSD - was Re: [xml-dev] Is Web 2.

RE: [xml-dev] Avoding a repeat of W3C XSD - was Re: [xml-dev] Is Web 2.

[ Lists Home | Date Index | Thread Index ]

To: "'Rich Salz'" <rsalz@datapower.com>,"'Robin Berjon'" <robin.berjon@expway.fr>
Subject: RE: [xml-dev] Avoding a repeat of W3C XSD - was Re: [xml-dev] Is Web 2.0 the new XML?
From: "Michael Kay" <mike@saxonica.com>
Date: Sat, 20 Aug 2005 09:33:26 +0100
Cc: "'XML Developers List'" <xml-dev@lists.xml.org>
In-reply-to: <43064AAE.4060307@datapower.com>
Thread-index: AcWlAnwS0OFL0FkVQfSbRVbnfZvVbAAX0asA

> Perhaps W3C should formalize an "interim public review" 
> phase, which is 
> a WD that is explicitly put out for review

It's called a Public Working Draft - there are lots of them.

Michael Kay

References:
- Re: [xml-dev] Avoding a repeat of W3C XSD - was Re: [xml-dev] Is Web 2.0 the new XML?
  - From: Rich Salz <rsalz@datapower.com>

Prev by Date: Re: [xml-dev] Avoding a repeat of W3C XSD - was Re: [xml-dev] IsWeb 2.0 the new XML?
Next by Date: RE:Namespaces are flawed
Previous by thread: Re: [xml-dev] Avoding a repeat of W3C XSD - was Re: [xml-dev] Is Web 2.0 the new XML?
Next by thread: Re: [xml-dev] Avoding a repeat of W3C XSD - was Re: [xml-dev] IsWeb 2.0 the new XML?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

News | XML in Industry | Calendar | XML Registry
Marketplace | Resources | MyXML.org | Sponsors | Privacy Statement

Copyright 2001 XML.org. This site is hosted by OASIS