Lists Home |
Date Index |
> This is the second time in this thread I've seen it written that
> Namespaces are flawed.
It used to be a permathread on this list, but everyone's given up moaning
except when they discover some new implication.
The biggest problem is that the spec tries to make prefixes non-significant
Another problem is that the spec is vague as to what constitutes a valid
namespace URI (and whether it is ever meaningful to dereference a namespace
URI, resolve it against another URI, etc)
The root cause of the problem is that the layering is wrong: naming is
fundamental to XML, and you can't add something fundamental as an optional
layer on top of the core. At any rate, you shouldn't.