[
Lists Home |
Date Index |
Thread Index
]
- To: Michael Kay <mike@saxonica.com>, 'xml dev' <xml-dev@lists.xml.org>
- Subject: RE: [xml-dev] basic qs - how is xml more flexible for exchanging data?
- From: Anil Philip <goodnewsforyou@yahoo.com>
- Date: Thu, 15 Sep 2005 13:10:50 -0700 (PDT)
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=Message-ID:Received:Date:From:Subject:To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=hRSM9g/IKnD1mcr/ebovsKQmP7hYSxZBKL++aoR5o5hZ7vy7s1b6yfTemWO+7XGz/LKEuSCFmzia8BoEYQYeNUsICkRIRgONTS0FQIgK2MOCiZbsaPz8wZdqRNknO61V8gWDAlwA97TgQbz7aAyuf0MxqiE77AeAuR+rfnxf47Y= ;
I dont think you understood the post - I meant when
one transfers binary data (in a file or stream). I am
not referring to C compilers and it's not about
metadata or validation. Where are you now?
--- Michael Kay <mike@saxonica.com> wrote:
> Two C compilers on different architectures would
> represent that structure
> quite differently. There's no data interchange there
> at all except between
> identical machines with identical compilers running
> identical applications;
> there's no scope for attaching metadata to the
> message; there's no scope for
> validation... Where have you been all these years?
>
> Michael Kay
> http://www.saxonica.com/
>
>
>
__________________________________
Yahoo! Mail - PC Magazine Editors' Choice 2005
http://mail.yahoo.com
|
