[
Lists Home |
Date Index |
Thread Index
]
- To: basudeb gupta <basudeb0001@yahoo.com>, Michael Kay <mike@saxonica.com>
- Subject: Re: [xml-dev] Transmission of XML Data
- From: Mukul Gandhi <mukul_gandhi@yahoo.com>
- Date: Tue, 18 Oct 2005 09:15:50 -0700 (PDT)
- Cc: 'xml dev' <xml-dev@lists.xml.org>
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=Message-ID:Received:Date:From:Subject:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=N24kg0Y4eFs/8HPB8LNTBi6casqskSzfPvoUtwRXgErTJj90jcBoZAxCzay3novoAi3w2dBnK/fzyyd/2qWxSuOMyymDsvJFHNpnbQfyi8guAkeDn4mmk8xK6YbstVKuuplX3K6xF6Mlj8pdtv/pa2BFXW3RZDwrVVGALAwCncs= ;
- In-reply-to: <20051018063342.66462.qmail@web31514.mail.mud.yahoo.com>
Here is a link having information about XML encryption
http://xml.coverpages.org/xmlAndEncryption.html
You said, there is bandwidth wastage while exchanging
XML in expanded form. I feel people might be doing
tradeoff between bandwidth consumption, and the extra
processing power consumed at sender and reciever end
for encryption and decryption.
Regards,
Mukul
--- basudeb gupta <basudeb0001@yahoo.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Here is another question of an ignorant person.
>
> How is the XML Data actually exchanged? Is it in its
> full glorious expanded form? If so, is it not a
> great
> loss of bandwidth?
>
> If not, I assume there are compression mechanisms
> available in the send and receive functions used by
> such programs which exchange XML data? Can someone
> please guide me on the current state of the art?
>
> I, coming from working on a protocol called SIGCOMP,
> feel strongly that an exchangeable compression
> decompression format may also be quite suitable for
> XML data exchange.
>
> Am I redreaming the wheel?
>
> Thanks
> Basudeb
__________________________________
Yahoo! Music Unlimited
Access over 1 million songs. Try it free.
http://music.yahoo.com/unlimited/
|
