[
Lists Home |
Date Index |
Thread Index
]
Hello Jan,
No, you cannot do that. The part of the spec that does not allow this is:
http://www.w3.org/TR/xmlschema-1/#sch-props-correct
***
2 Each of the {type definitions}, {element declarations}, {attribute
group definitions}, {model group definitions} and {notation
declarations} must not contain two or more schema components with the
same {name} and {target namespace}.
***
Best Regards,
George
---------------------------------------------------------------------
George Cristian Bina
<oXygen/> XML Editor, Schema Editor and XSLT Editor/Debugger
http://www.oxygenxml.com
jalgermissen@topicmapping.com wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have a short question I have not been able to answer reading the XSD specs.
>
> Suppose I have a schema A defining an element Foo and a schema B that includes A. Is it ok for schema B to also define Foo (in a different way)? Does such a redefinition take precedence over A's definition of Foo? Is there a constraint that every valid Foo(B) must also be a valid Foo(A)?
>
> [I am NOT intending to use/cannot use the <redefine> element, BTW]
>
> Thanks in advance for any help.
>
> Jan
>
> -----------------------------------------------------------------
> The xml-dev list is sponsored by XML.org <http://www.xml.org>, an
> initiative of OASIS <http://www.oasis-open.org>
>
> The list archives are at http://lists.xml.org/archives/xml-dev/
>
> To subscribe or unsubscribe from this list use the subscription
> manager: <http://www.oasis-open.org/mlmanage/index.php>
>
|
