[
Lists Home |
Date Index |
Thread Index
]
- To: Michael Kay <mike@saxonica.com>
- Subject: Re: [xml-dev] Best Practice for URI construction?
- From: Peter Hunsberger <peter.hunsberger@gmail.com>
- Date: Wed, 14 Dec 2005 11:02:38 -0600
- Cc: XML Developers List <xml-dev@lists.xml.org>
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=aplvcyqqulwyEiLqrUoxfGsefS92TvGOM8arF2LoLdVs8kcRefuv++HusKpKuxdDjiv5vsobVJh3v3+JaGRNUUiuFim+1oKdTedQBUACue4a+dQh9qE6L8Fce+RmTisnYaxhjSXGsblE1Av9DROqCYbF9q8FMuH4p57vcQhVzNM=
- In-reply-to: <43a04c64.66a2114a.7ca9.5747SMTPIN_ADDED@mx.gmail.com>
- References: <cc159a4a0512140826k25cd9c80k31a4a3fd40b5b562@mail.gmail.com> <43a04c64.66a2114a.7ca9.5747SMTPIN_ADDED@mx.gmail.com>
On 12/14/05, Michael Kay <mike@saxonica.com> wrote:
> > Sure, but I don't see how any of that relates to my proposal?
>
> It wasn't intended to. Threads can get entangled. IIRC your posts (Peter)
> have been advocating a very concrete use of URIs as (effectively) things you
> can ask for on the web. I'm fine with that. It's the metaphysical use of
> URIs to identify non-computer things that I have problems with.
Got'cha. You had posted that in reply to me, but yes, the thread does
sort of jump all over the place...
--
Peter Hunsberger
|
