[
Lists Home |
Date Index |
Thread Index
]
I generaly think that some kind of table of contents works well,
Also if there is no entries for that month it should say so, but show
you entries by the year instead to save the user a step. And if there
is no entries by year, show you all the entries etc...
Richard
On 21/12/05, Klaus Backert <Klaus.Backert@t-online.de> wrote:
>
> Am 21.12.2005 um 15:44 schrieb Richard Lainchbury:
>
> > I would add, that when passing dates in the GET string ie:
> >
> <snip>
> >
> > and if you are using a folder structure
> > www.example.com/news/2005/10/04/
> > that the international date standard is used.
> >
> > I would also say that each level should have the expected content
> > in eg.
> > www.example.com/news/2005/10/ should have all the news articles from
> > october 2005 in.
>
> I have seen some web-sites delivering a table of content - instead of
> the content itself - in such a case (and not only for dates). This is
> good (best?) practice too, I think.
>
> Klaus
>
|