[
Lists Home |
Date Index |
Thread Index
]
Thanks Len. To your mention of:
> (eg, do web services of necessity rely on SOA and vice versa,
Recognizing that you were not asking this, my answer is: no.
One may have a SOA without Web Services, and Web Services without SOA.
We mention this point somewhere in the SOA-RM spec.
Joe
Joseph Chiusano
Associate
Booz Allen Hamilton
700 13th St. NW, Suite 1100
Washington, DC 20005
O: 202-508-6514
C: 202-251-0731
Visit us online@ http://www.boozallen.com
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Bullard, Claude L (Len) [mailto:len.bullard@intergraph.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, January 10, 2006 11:09 AM
> To: Chiusano Joseph; xml-dev@lists.xml.org
> Subject: RE: [xml-dev] Will The Real SOA Please Sit Down?
>
> I think each has a use although one and two overlap.
> They are not equally strong. It comes down to purposes and
> the audience. One and two lead to conflicts of application
> (eg, do web services of necessity rely on SOA and vice versa,
> is REST and SOA, etc.), whereas the third is easy to explain
> and currently a good pitch for selling systems because it
> explains an approach to problems the majority of buyers have
> at this time (sell to their pain).
>
> A recurring problem in our industry, particularly in the web
> media, is embracing geekTalk for suitTalk when the geeks
> disagree and the suits don't. The web is self-obsessed and
> that exacerbates the problem as it encourages opportunistic behaviors.
>
> So your spec is most welcome, Joe, as it provides a single
> citation instead of a 'see Google' response.
>
> http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/download.php/15966/wd-soa
> -rm-11.pdf
>
> len
>
>
> From: Chiusano Joseph [mailto:chiusano_joseph@bah.com]
>
> I would say that they are all correct, and all equally
> useful. The best situation would be to have a single
> definition that comprises all of these, as they each point
> out valuable and important aspects of SOA.
>
|
