xml-dev - Re: [xml-dev] FOP 0.91 Beta

Re: [xml-dev] FOP 0.91 Beta - How good is it?

[ Lists Home | Date Index | Thread Index ]

To: Jonathan Robie <jonathan.robie@datadirect.com>
Subject: Re: [xml-dev] FOP 0.91 Beta - How good is it?
From: Gavin Thomas Nicol <gtn@rbii.com>
Date: Fri, 24 Feb 2006 00:11:30 -0500
Cc: "'XML Developers List'" <xml-dev@lists.xml.org>
In-reply-to: <43FE2AAA.3090101@datadirect.com>
References: <43FE2AAA.3090101@datadirect.com>


On Feb 23, 2006, at 4:35 PM, Jonathan Robie wrote:

> Does anyone have experience with the FOP 0.91 beta (http:// 
> xmlgraphics.apache.org/fop/0.91/)? How good is it? How well does  
> their RTF support work? Does it work with diacritics?
>
> Is it anywhere close to being in the same league with RenderX or  
> Antenna House?

Not even close in my experience.

References:
- FOP 0.91 Beta - How good is it?
  - From: Jonathan Robie <jonathan.robie@datadirect.com>

Prev by Date: Re: [xml-dev] XSD substitution groups, subtypes, nillable .. thewhole smack
Next by Date: RE: [xml-dev] xml xsl web architecture
Previous by thread: FOP 0.91 Beta - How good is it?
Next by thread: RE: [xml-dev] Did Documents Win? No. Objects Just Couldn't GetTheir Act Together.
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread