|
|
Re: Re: [xml-dev] The Rule of Least Power - does it miss the point?
|
[
Lists Home |
Date Index |
Thread Index
]
Please note Thats not a slam towards you, and instead a realization that there are simply those in whom have a higher level of understanding, and while I admire this, I'm also happy being a good 50 or so notches down on the IQ rating as I already think too much as it is... to imagine a world in which it was possible to be required to think even more than I do... Just such a thought should scare most everyone on this list into giving thanks to whomever they might or might not pray to that this is simply not the case... :D
XOXOXOXO :D
On 3/9/06, M. David Peterson <xmlhacker@gmail.com> wrote:
I think I have reached a point in my career in which I have decided that if things have become so complex that most dictionaries, including geek dictionaries, have yet to catch up with the words and phrases being used... I'm either simply too damn stupid to get it, or things have just got to damn complex, and they dont need to be.
I'm voting for a little of both myself, but none the less I will throw this question into the mix just for the hell of it:
What on earth did you just say? I'll accept the fact that I'm simply too dumb to understand, if you'll accept the fact that what you just said "dontmakanosense".
Oh well, I'll stick to writing code.... its more fun... I think...
On 3/9/06, Bullard, Claude L (Len) <len.bullard@intergraph.com
> wrote:
They take the names in the author slots seriously.
Think of it as the high side of the long tail and
look up "vanara".
As I said, after a month of digging through papers
on pragmatics and business intelligence, this is the
subjective approach: reality is what you say it is
if enough people agree. Subjective systems provide
for multiple points of view over the same information.
Objective systems provide for information plus operations
so really, one point of view. As you know, a
subjective system is Heisenbergian: information is
in superposition until measured and measurement is
a means of objectification. So what you see is data
moved in superposition (in a range from delimited
to XML, for example), received, then objectified.
Information is transported subjective;y (least
power, least authority) and objectified for
local processing. As a writer on Grice's Maxims
titled his article: "Do The Right Thing".
Gotta go to a meeting now and try with all my
might to remain objective. ;-)
len
From: Richard Salz [mailto:rsalz@us.ibm.com]
I find it hard to believe that folks take this serious. Perhaps they can
also resolve the which editor is best, now that we've been told how to
choose a programing language. Perhaps we'll see a PhD thesis on this
soon.
The rule, principal, commandment, whatever, is really very simple: choose
the right one.
-----------------------------------------------------------------
The xml-dev list is sponsored by XML.org <
http://www.xml.org>, an
initiative of OASIS <
http://www.oasis-open.org>
The list archives are at
http://lists.xml.org/archives/xml-dev/
To subscribe or unsubscribe from this list use the subscription
manager: <http://www.oasis-open.org/mlmanage/index.php>
--
<M:D/>
M. David Peterson
http://www.xsltblog.com/
|
|
|
|
|
|