[
Lists Home |
Date Index |
Thread Index
]
Jason Hunter wrote:
>> In some internal discussions of the XLinq http://
>> msdn.microsoft.com/netframework/future/linq/ project, I got a very
>> interesting bit of devil's advocacy that went something like
>> this: "People complain about the DOM, but they don't embrace
>> alternatives. For all the work that people have done to provide
>> alternatives such as JDOM, dom4j, XOM, etc. in the Java world, the
>> typical users and the major Java players still use DOM, warts and
>> all." I'm not at all convinced this is true, but I don't have
>> any information at my fingertips to dispute it. Would anyone care
>> to present facts on one side or the other?
>
> There's a poll at servlets.com that asked this question:
>
> http://www.servlets.com/polls/results.tea?name=doms
This resource gives a 500 response. It wouldn't be a J2EE app by any
chance?
--
犬 Chris Burdess
"They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little safety
deserve neither liberty nor safety." - Benjamin Franklin
|
