xml-dev - Re: [xml-dev] DOM usage within browsers. vs. 'stand-alone' DOM (was DOM'

Re: [xml-dev] DOM usage within browsers. vs. 'stand-alone' DOM (was DOM'

[ Lists Home | Date Index | Thread Index ]

To: XML Developers List <xml-dev@lists.xml.org>
Subject: Re: [xml-dev] DOM usage within browsers. vs. 'stand-alone' DOM (was DOM's javascript roots)
From: Gavin Thomas Nicol <gtn@rbii.com>
Date: Wed, 26 Apr 2006 00:32:21 -0400
In-reply-to: <20060406182845.41789.qmail@web32815.mail.mud.yahoo.com>
References: <20060406182845.41789.qmail@web32815.mail.mud.yahoo.com>


On Apr 6, 2006, at 2:28 PM, Tatu Saloranta wrote:

> What might be necessary is really to divide the scope
> in two somewhat disjoint pieces: case of having
> general API/framework for manipulating XML within
> browser platform; and the case of using DOM on other
> platforms.
>
> Since DOM came from the former, maybe it has more
> relevance within that domain.

Actually, it didn't and the bifurcation started with Core vs. HTML DOM.

References:
- DOM usage within browsers. vs. 'stand-alone' DOM (was DOM's javascript roots)
  - From: Tatu Saloranta <cowtowncoder@yahoo.com>

Prev by Date: RE: [xml-dev] Inversion of control (was: DOM's javascript roots (was Re: [xml-dev] Have JDOM / XOM / etc. failed?))
Next by Date: Re: [xml-dev] DOM's javascript roots (was Re: [xml-dev] Have JDOM / XOM / etc. failed?)
Previous by thread: DOM usage within browsers. vs. 'stand-alone' DOM (was DOM's javascript roots)
Next by thread: RE: Re: [xml-dev] DOM's javascript roots (was Re: [xml-dev] HaveJDOM / XOM / etc. failed?)
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread