Lists Home |
Date Index |
- To: "MURATA Makoto \(FAMILY Given\)" <firstname.lastname@example.org>, email@example.com
- Subject: Re: [xml-dev] NVDL as a dispatching architecture
- From: Tatu Saloranta <firstname.lastname@example.org>
- Date: Mon, 8 May 2006 17:19:51 -0700 (PDT)
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=Message-ID:Received:Date:From:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=ymKYr8KFJU700wGYJMPySWAVENamAJAPLgYVftyc3uQPjTBbe/tAoyi+VcQIMOaDiDIkihTyiqgQpWbUw9RtfF8/zv4NWSyQRpYN+zCtJiF1ArIHdb/62+VKmFxqDrcPdhiL/9s1jWVlrGGV5ynzguK7Ije6w4X5g9079oprpyc= ;
- In-reply-to: <20060509065207.3AE9.EB2M-MRT@asahi-net.or.jp>
--- "MURATA Makoto (FAMILY Given)"
> However, the NVDL specification is silent about such
> frameworks. I believe that we need much more
> experiences with NVDL
> first. Also, I am not sure that standardization is
> the right approach
> for designing such application frameworks. (E.g.,
> SAX, DOM, and even
> STAX may be used for constructing them.)
> I am hoping that early adaptors of NVDL accumulate
> board experiences
> and make a hundred flowers blossom.
This seems reasonable.
It is interesting to read about NVDL, since
(for what it's worth) I have written a simple
validation framework that builds on StAX. This was
done as part of experimental Stax^2 set of extensions
on basic stax api, and allows for multiple validators
on individual input (parsing) and output
(serialization streams), including possibility to
start/stop individual validators mid-stream. I have
not added any support for inter-validator co-operation
at this point, although that would be a possibility
(within limitations of the streaming model).
Currently validators exist for basic DTD (provided
natively by the stax impl), and RNG (using MSV);
adding one for w3c schema is planned (using MSV as
This approach is obviously less generic than NVDL, but
seems reasonable for efficient validation within
context of stax (pull) processing.
-+ Tatu +-
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around