[
Lists Home |
Date Index |
Thread Index
]
> Any feedback on why the creation of a single, shared
> definition may (or may not) be the best approach would be
> very valuable. I'm all ears.:)
If the agreed shared definition is as fuzzy as any of the three candidates,
let alone the union of the three, then the only useful purpose it will serve
is to enable a significant number of intelligent people to stop debating
this nonsense and do something productive instead.
Michael Kay
http://www.saxonica.com/
|