[
Lists Home |
Date Index |
Thread Index
]
Hi Jeff,
Yes, there is a lot of recursion (in sections, lists, etc.). I am just
surprised that no one has run into this before. Maybe no one is using
Word to edit XML using custom schemas.
Nadia
Jeff Greif <jeff.greif@gmail.com>
2006-05-17 11:50
Please respond to jgreif
To: Nadia.Swaby@pwc.ca, "xml-dev@lists.xml.org" <xml-dev@lists.xml.org>
cc:
Subject: Re: [xml-dev] Word 2003 custom schema limitations
Possibly some content model is recursive (e.g. block elements in HTML).
Jeff
Nadia.Swaby@pwc.ca wrote:
> Hi David,
>
> I did some grouping so that some of the elements (i.e. links, footnotes
> and the like) are no longer global.
>
> Maybe that's what the problem is. I will have to do some testing to
find
> out.
>
> Nadia
>
>
>
>
> David Carlisle <davidc@nag.co.uk>
> 2006-05-17 09:58
>
>
> To: Nadia.Swaby@pwc.ca
> cc: xml-dev@lists.xml.org
> Subject: Re: [xml-dev] Word 2003 custom schema
limitations
>
>
>
>
>> So, I got our custom DTD converted to a schema
>> ..
>> The XML schema cannot be used because it has more than 256 levels of
>> hierarchy.
>>
>
> Given that all element declarations in a DTD are global, how did the
> conversion end up with (presumably) 256 levels of element tyope
> declaration? I don't know anything about Word's restrictions, but
> couldn't you have a simpler schema?
>
> David
>
|
