xml-dev - Re: [xml-dev] UBL 2, W3C Schema extensibility, and multiple

Re: [xml-dev] UBL 2, W3C Schema extensibility, and multiple

[ Lists Home | Date Index | Thread Index ]

To: "Michael Kay" <mike@saxonica.com>
Subject: Re: [xml-dev] UBL 2, W3C Schema extensibility, and multiple
From: "bryan rasmussen" <rasmussen.bryan@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 23 May 2006 15:36:32 +0200
Cc: "G. Ken Holman" <gkholman@cranesoftwrights.com>, "XML-Dev Mailing list" <xml-dev@lists.xml.org>
Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=BVAxzq5nvYvyzG94bguFvd3kVXw8TXJYJrshyjBN1hTpKhExgtBZClsSj6peoKPE1pYriswTzXwAPW5DxwxqY2nZrs5wCycbOrHNUnXDuPZPcvvKaBOhLDHbITF4HzfK0wGIsbIn3CBHOTRldRGGmDTCanrNsPTgVU2XDGCAfKg=
In-reply-to: <00f201c67e68$29587780$1a09010a@turtle>
References: <7.0.1.0.2.20060523133333.036bb958@CraneSoftwrights.com> <00f201c67e68$29587780$1a09010a@turtle>

> Clause 2.3 means that the null namespace (.absent.) does not match ##other.
>
> ##local matches names that are not namespace-qualified (i.e. names in the
> null namespace).

Yeah, unfortunate  bug in some validators on this matter then.

Cheers,
Bryan Rasmussen

References:
- UBL 2, W3C Schema extensibility, and multiple
  - From: "G. Ken Holman" <gkholman@CraneSoftwrights.com>
- RE: [xml-dev] UBL 2, W3C Schema extensibility, and multiple
  - From: "Michael Kay" <mike@saxonica.com>

Prev by Date: Re: [xml-dev] Re: [ubl-dev] UBL 2.0 and Schema Extensibility
Next by Date: Re: specify element type depending of same element attribute value?
Previous by thread: RE: [xml-dev] UBL 2, W3C Schema extensibility, and multiple
Next by thread: RE: [xml-dev] UBL 2, W3C Schema extensibility, and multiple
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread